Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX1
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63


96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced August 2009

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX1 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TX1 (1/2.4") feature totally different sensor sizes.

The E-M10 III was revealed 8 years later than the TX1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-M10 III grades versus the TX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony TX1
E-M10 III | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | ![]() | August 2009 | More recent by 99 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Olympus E-M10 III
TX1 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony TX1
E-M10 III | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III has external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Sony TX1 has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III versus the TX1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and TX1 is 80 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out technical specs. The graphic here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and TX1.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will show greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2009-08-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 8cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 lbs) | 142 grams (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $650 | $350 |