Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front
Portability
96
Imaging
41
Features
48
Overall
43

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony TX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Overview

Here is a complete overview of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony TX200V, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is fairly similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TX200V (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 III was brought out 5 years later than the TX200V and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M10 III scores vs the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony TX200V

 E-M10 III TX200V 
RevealedAugust 2017January 2012Fresher by 68 months
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus E-M10 III

 TX200V E-M10 III 
Display sizing3.3"3"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k1040kSharper display (+190k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony TX200V

 E-M10 III TX200V 
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony TX200V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III and the TX200V.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and TX200V is 80 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by going over specifications. The visual here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and TX200V.

Plainly, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony TX200V will offer you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography advice
Sony TX200V Portrait photography advice
73
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focus
supports RAW formats
36
megapixel count good (18MP)
has face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
Sony TX200V as a Street photography camera
77
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
features touch focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
heavier than average in class (410g)
67
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch to focus
environment sealing
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography info
Sony TX200V Sports photography info
69
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect auto focus
49
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18MP)
has tracking autofocus
environment sealing
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography advice
Sony TX200V Travel photography advice
67
features touch focus
good megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
heavier than average in class (410 grams)
does not have selfie friendly display
71
environment sealing
provides touch to focus
megapixel count good (18MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Landscape photography with Sony TX200V
80
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
46
quite wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3.3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
environment sealing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Sony TX200V
32
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
does not have external mic port
heavier than average in class (410g)
35
quite wide (28mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony TX200V
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Released 2017-08-31 2012-01-30
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 18 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 25600 12800
Min native ISO 200 64
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-4.8
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3.3 inches
Display resolution 1,040k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 8.6fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 3.10 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 gr (0.90 pounds) 129 gr (0.28 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photos 220 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $650 $500