Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63


96 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed January 2012

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony TX200V, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is fairly similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TX200V (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

The E-M10 III was brought out 5 years later than the TX200V and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M10 III scores vs the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony TX200V
E-M10 III | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2017 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 68 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus E-M10 III
TX200V | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 1040k | Sharper display (+190k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony TX200V
E-M10 III | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony TX200V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III and the TX200V.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and TX200V is 80 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by going over specifications. The visual here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and TX200V.
Plainly, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony TX200V will offer you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 pounds) | 129 gr (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 220 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $650 | $500 |