Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX66

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 front
Portability
97
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX66 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony TX66
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
  • Announced February 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX66 Overview

Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony TX66, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the TX66 (18MP) is pretty close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TX66 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 III was unveiled 5 years after the TX66 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX66 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-M10 III scores vs the TX66 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony TX66

 E-M10 III TX66 
AnnouncedAugust 2017February 2012More modern by 68 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Sony TX66 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 TX66 E-M10 III 
Screen dimension3.3"3"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k1040kCrisper screen (+190k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony TX66

 E-M10 III TX66 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX66 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III offers exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Sony TX66 has proportions of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") along with a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony TX66 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-M10 III against the TX66.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX66 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and TX66 is 80 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX66 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX66 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The image underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and TX66.

To sum up, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony TX66 will result in extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX66 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX66 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX66 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Portrait photography with Sony TX66
73
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
saves RAW formats
41
manual focus
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography factors
Sony TX66 Street photography factors
77
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
provides touch to focus
good high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than average (410g)
64
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers touch to focus
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography info
Sony TX66 Sports photography info
69
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
does not have phase detect auto focus
49
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
features tracking focus
great battery power (250 per charge)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography advice
Sony TX66 Travel photography advice
67
provides touch to focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
more heavy than average (410 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
72
great battery power (250 CIPA)
offers touch to focus
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography features
Sony TX66 Landscape photography features
80
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
51
manual focus
reasonably wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3.3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18MP)
great battery power (250 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Sony TX66
32
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
missing microphone jack
more heavy than average (410g)
36
reasonably wide (26mm)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony TX66 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony TX66
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Released 2017-08-31 2012-02-28
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 18 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4896 x 3672
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-4.8
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3.3 inches
Screen resolution 1,040k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - XtraFine TruBlack OLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 3.10 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lbs) 109 grams (0.24 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 images 250 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $650 $350