Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W290

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
28
Overall
32

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W290 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Introduced August 2017
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony W290
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W290 Overview

In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony W290, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and W290 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and W290 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 III was launched 8 years after the W290 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W290 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-M10 III grades against the W290 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony W290

 E-M10 III W290 
LaunchedAugust 2017February 2009Newer by 104 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k230kSharper screen (+810k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 W290 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony W290

 E-M10 III W290 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony W290 has sizing of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony W290 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III versus the W290.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W290 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and W290 is 80 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W290 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The image below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and W290.

Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W290 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W290 as a Portrait photography camera
73
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
27
focusing manually
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
Sony W290 as a Street photography camera
77
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
comes with touch focus
great high ISO (25,600)
heavier than competition (410g)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography features
Sony W290 Sports photography features
69
silent mode (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
no phase detect AF
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
max fps very slow (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography advice
Sony W290 Travel photography advice
67
comes with touch focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
heavier than competition (410 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
57
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography details
Sony W290 Landscape photography details
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
41
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging info
Sony W290 Vlogging info
32
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of mic support
heavier than competition (410 grams)
28
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony W290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony W290
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2017-08-31 2009-02-17
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW photos
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 8.6 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 3.90 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lb) 167 grams (0.37 lb)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $650 $230