Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX220

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 front
Portability
96
Imaging
43
Features
41
Overall
42

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX220 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony WX220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX220 Overview

Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony WX220, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the WX220 (18MP) is relatively similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and WX220 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 III was released 3 years after the WX220 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 III scores versus the WX220 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony WX220

 E-M10 III WX220 
RevealedAugust 2017February 2014Newer by 44 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k460kClearer screen (+580k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 WX220 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony WX220

 E-M10 III WX220 
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III offers exterior dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Sony WX220 has specifications of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony WX220 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III and the WX220.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX220 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and WX220 is 80 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX220 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The picture here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and WX220.

As you can tell, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Sony WX220 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX220 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography details
Sony WX220 Portrait photography details
73
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
37
MP count decent (18MP)
includes face detect focusing
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography information
Sony WX220 Street photography information
77
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
provides focus by touch
above average high ISO (25,600)
heavier than average (410g)
59
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography details
Sony WX220 Sports photography details
69
silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect auto focus
46
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18MP)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography details
Sony WX220 Travel photography details
67
provides focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
heavier than average (410g)
screen is not selfie friendly
69
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long reach (250mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Landscape photography with Sony WX220
80
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
44
really wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging advice
Sony WX220 Vlogging advice
32
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focus
good video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic socket
heavier than average (410 grams)
34
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony WX220
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2017-08-31 2014-02-12
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 18MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4896 x 3672
Max native ISO 25600 12800
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-250mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 3.70 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lbs) 121 grams (0.27 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photos 210 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $650 $198