Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX500

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 front
Portability
91
Imaging
44
Features
56
Overall
48

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX500 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Announced August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony WX500
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
  • 236g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
  • Revealed April 2015
  • Superseded the Sony WX350
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX500 Overview

In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony WX500, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the WX500 (18MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and WX500 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M10 III was launched 2 years after the WX500 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX500 being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the WX500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony WX500

 E-M10 III WX500 
RevealedAugust 2017April 2015Newer by 29 months
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Display resolution1040k921kSharper display (+119k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony WX500 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 WX500 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony WX500

 E-M10 III WX500 
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX500 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III offers physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Sony WX500 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony WX500 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the WX500.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX500 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and WX500 is 80 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX500 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX500 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The image here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and WX500.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony WX500 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX500 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX500 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography details
Sony WX500 Portrait photography details
73
manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
39
decent megapixels (18MP)
includes face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
Sony WX500 as a Street photography camera
77
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
provides focus by touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than others in class (410g)
70
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (236 grams)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Sports photography with Sony WX500
69
silent mode (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
doesn't have phase detect AF
57
amazing zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
great battery (360 CIPA)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Travel photography camera
Sony WX500 as a Travel photography camera
67
provides focus by touch
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
more heavy than others in class (410 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
71
great battery (360 per charge)
lighter than competitors in class (236 grams)
decent megapixels (18 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long zoom (720mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Landscape photography with Sony WX500
80
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
49
reasonably wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18MP)
great battery (360 per charge)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging details
Sony WX500 Vlogging details
32
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no external microphone port
more heavy than others in class (410 grams)
35
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (236g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
doesn't have mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony WX500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony WX500
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2017-08-31 2015-04-14
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 18MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 25600 12800
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-720mm (30.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-6.4
Macro focus range - 5cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 8.6fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 5.40 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lb) 236 grams (0.52 lb)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 pictures 360 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $650 $348