Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A65

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony SLT-A65 front
Portability
64
Imaging
64
Features
85
Overall
72

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A65 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Introduced August 2017
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony A65
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
  • Launched November 2011
  • Later Model is Sony A68
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A65 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A65, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 III was manufactured 5 years later than the A65 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M10 III grades versus the A65 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony A65

 E-M10 III A65 
LaunchedAugust 2017November 2011Fresher by 71 months
Screen resolution1040k921kSharper screen (+119k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 A65 E-M10 III 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A65

 E-M10 III A65 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Sony A65 has measurements of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A65 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 III against the A65.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A65 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and A65 is 80 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and A65.

Clearly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sony A65 will show more detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography information
Sony A65 Portrait photography information
73
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
78
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focus
exports RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
Sony A65 as a Street photography camera
77
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
includes touch to focus
great ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competitors (410g)
77
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography highlights
Sony A65 Sports photography highlights
69
silent shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect AF
82
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
comes with phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography factors
Sony A65 Travel photography factors
67
includes touch to focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
heavier than competitors (410 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
68
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
no Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Landscape photography with Sony A65
80
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
75
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging details
Sony A65 Vlogging details
32
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic support
heavier than competitors (410g)
78
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony A65
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony SLT-A65
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony SLT-A65
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2017-08-31 2011-11-15
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 107 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting rate 8.6 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 gr (0.90 lb) 622 gr (1.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 74
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 717
Other
Battery life 330 shots 560 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Price at launch $650 $700