Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Launched March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M10 was manufactured 5 years after the SP-565UZ which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M10 scores versus the SP-565UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M10 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 63 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-M10
SP-565UZ | E-M10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M10 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 offers physical measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 compared to the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4294/e4294b409947632aaf644f6d4d025047cb615d16" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and SP-565UZ is 82 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55c/4c55c038902519654814d1dec7aa26a213a2b345" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The picture here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 and SP-565UZ.
Plainly, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 will render extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 should have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f609/4f60930aab8008399e38c54068203c7d4a4cabcb" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/093c4/093c4360eb65975512c25801fec71cd1daaccc59" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2014-03-18 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396g (0.87 lbs) | 413g (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $600 | $400 |