Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus Tough-3000
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Announced March 2014
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M10 was launched 4 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-M10 matches up vs the Tough-3000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-M10 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | January 2010 | More recent by 52 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-M10
Tough-3000 | E-M10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-M10 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 enjoys exterior measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") having a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus Tough-3000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 against the Tough-3000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and Tough-3000 is 82 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 and Tough-3000.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 will produce more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also called | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2014-03-18 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396 grams (0.87 pounds) | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $600 | $0 |