Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-3
Portability
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 II
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-3, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is very similar but the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe E-M10 was announced very close to the TG-3 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 scores versus the TG-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 & Olympus Tough TG-3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus TG-3
| E-M10 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-M10
| TG-3 | E-M10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus TG-3
| E-M10 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | March 2014 | Similar age |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 offers exterior measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 and the TG-3.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 and TG-3 is 82 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over technical specs. The visual here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 and TG-3.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have the same resolution but different sensor measurements. The E-M10 includes the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field easier.
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M10 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
MP count decent (16MP)
features face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M10 Street photography advice
Olympus TG-3 Street photography advice
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
has focus by touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than others in class (396 grams)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than competitors (247 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Olympus E-M10 Sports photography details
Olympus TG-3 Sports photography details
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
lacks phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
weather sealing
great battery (330 shots)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus E-M10
Travel photography with Olympus TG-3
has focus by touch
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
heavier than others in class (396g)
does not have selfie friendly display
great battery (330 CIPA)
weather sealing
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competitors (247g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-3
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
really wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
great battery (330 shots)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Vlogging camera
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
does not have mic port
heavier than others in class (396 grams)
really wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no mic jack
heavier than competitors (247 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2014-03-18 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO100) | - |
| Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual（1/1（FULL）～1/64） | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 396 grams (0.87 lbs) | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 884 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 images | 330 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $600 | $350 |
