Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-5
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Announced March 2014
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2017
- Older Model is Olympus TG-4
- Replacement is Olympus TG-6
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M10 versus Olympus TG-5, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and TG-5 (12MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and TG-5 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M10 was revealed 4 years earlier than the TG-5 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-M10 matches up against the TG-5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Olympus Tough TG-5. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 Gallery and Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus TG-5
E-M10 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus E-M10
TG-5 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | March 2014 | Fresher by 38 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus TG-5
E-M10 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 enjoys exterior dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") having a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Olympus TG-5 has proportions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 versus Olympus TG-5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 and the TG-5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 and TG-5 is 82 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 and TG-5.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 will offer you extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older E-M10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2014-03-18 | 2017-05-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | - |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396 grams (0.87 lbs) | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 340 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $600 | $449 |