Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Launched March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-M10 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 was released 16 months after the XZ-2 iHS which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M10 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M10 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | December 2012 | More modern by 16 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Clearer screen (+117k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M10
XZ-2 iHS | E-M10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M10 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 offers exterior dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 and the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and XZ-2 iHS is 82 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing specifications. The image here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The newer E-M10 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-03-18 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 396g (0.87 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
Dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | 884 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 340 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $600 | $450 |