Clicky

Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
73
Overall
61
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Launched March 2014
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 II
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Announced December 2012
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-M10 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M10 was released 16 months after the XZ-2 iHS which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M10 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-M10 XZ-2 iHS 
AnnouncedMarch 2014December 2012More modern by 16 months
Screen resolution1037k920kClearer screen (+117k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M10

 XZ-2 iHS E-M10 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-M10 XZ-2 iHS 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 offers exterior dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 and the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and XZ-2 iHS is 82 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing specifications. The image here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 and XZ-2 iHS.

To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The newer E-M10 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Portrait photography advice
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography advice
71
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
46
has manual focus
comes with face detection focus
exports RAW files
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Street photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
77
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
features touch to focus
great ISO range (25,600)
heavier than others in class (396g)
66
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
heavier than competitors (346 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
lack of phase detect autofocus
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (340 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Travel photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography features
67
features touch to focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
heavier than others in class (396 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
61
better than average battery power (340 shots)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (346g)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography highlights
79
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
55
has manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (340 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
does not have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Vlogging features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging features
33
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic support
heavier than others in class (396 grams)
36
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has external mic jack
screen isn't selfie friendly
heavier than competitors (346 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M10Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2014-03-18 2012-12-18
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 81 35
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 1,440 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 8.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO100) 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash modes Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 396g (0.87 pounds) 346g (0.76 pounds)
Dimensions 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 72 49
DXO Color Depth score 22.8 20.4
DXO Dynamic range score 12.3 11.3
DXO Low light score 884 216
Other
Battery life 320 photos 340 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-5 Li-90B
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $600 $450