Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74ffb/74ffb1851885b9e3957d5f8590417174f0eb5bfe" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Launched March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 163g - 98 x 55 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FS10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M10 and Panasonic FH1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and FH1 (12MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and FH1 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M10 was introduced 4 years later than the FH1 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-M10 scores versus the FH1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 Gallery and Panasonic FH1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Panasonic FH1
E-M10 | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 52 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH1 over the Olympus E-M10
FH1 | E-M10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Panasonic FH1
E-M10 | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 features outside measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") and a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Panasonic FH1 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 and Panasonic FH1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 and the FH1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da27e/da27ebd7d67f861016f611a2841c057eef967b0d" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 and FH1 is 82 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2639e/2639ee228d81457ecc1933bdb61107f34123431a" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 and FH1.
As you can see, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 will result in greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fbe2/3fbe2da1d13a191ed45cf910a786d897f94fde19" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13d6a/13d6a2cf6576eb42eea920c5ddd160bf7fb4a7d7" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FH1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS10 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-03-18 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 6.80 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 396 gr (0.87 lb) | 163 gr (0.36 lb) |
Dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 98 x 55 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $600 | $150 |