Clicky

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FX78

Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
73
Overall
61
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
31
Overall
33

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Launched March 2014
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 II
Panasonic FX78
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
  • 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2011
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview

Here, we are looking at the Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FX78, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and FX78 (12MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M10 was announced 3 years later than the FX78 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M10 scores versus the FX78 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Panasonic FX78

 E-M10 FX78 
LaunchedMarch 2014January 2011Fresher by 39 months
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1037k230kClearer display (+807k dot)

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus E-M10

 FX78 E-M10 
Display size3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Panasonic FX78

 E-M10 FX78 
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 comes with outside measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX78 has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FX78 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 and the FX78.

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FX78 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 and FX78 is 82 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FX78 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The visual here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 and FX78.

As you can tell, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 will offer you greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FX78 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Portrait photography details
Panasonic FX78 Portrait photography details
71
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
21
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Street photography factors
Panasonic FX78 Street photography factors
77
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
features focus by touch
great ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than competition in class (396g)
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10
Sports photography with Panasonic FX78
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect AF
28
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery (200 shots)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FX78 as a Travel photography camera
67
features focus by touch
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
more heavy than competition in class (396 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
56
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
terrible battery (200 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Landscape photography information
Panasonic FX78 Landscape photography information
79
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
36
reasonably wide (24mm)
big screen (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
manual mode not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
terrible battery (200 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10
Vlogging with Panasonic FX78
33
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (396g)
33
reasonably wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 and Panasonic FX78
 Olympus OM-D E-M10Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
Also Known as - Lumix DMC-FX77
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2014-03-18 2011-01-25
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 81 11
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.5-5.9
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3.5"
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 1,440 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1400s
Continuous shooting rate 8.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO100) 5.60 m
Flash settings Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 396 grams (0.87 lbs) 142 grams (0.31 lbs)
Physical dimensions 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 884 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 images 200 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $600 $210