Clicky

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
73
Overall
61
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Introduced March 2014
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 II
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Announced July 2012
  • Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
  • Replacement is Panasonic FZ300
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Here is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-M10 versus Panasonic FZ200, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M10 was released 21 months later than the FZ200 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-M10 matches up versus the FZ200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Panasonic FZ200

 E-M10 FZ200 
AnnouncedMarch 2014July 2012Fresher by 21 months
Display resolution1037k460kSharper display (+577k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-M10

 FZ200 E-M10 
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Panasonic FZ200

 E-M10 FZ200 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 enjoys external measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") and a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") having a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M10 versus Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 against the FZ200.

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 and FZ200 is 82 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specs. The visual here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 and FZ200.

All in all, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M10 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Portrait photography features
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography features
71
focusing manually
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
48
has manual focus
great flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
includes face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Street photography camera
77
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
supports touch to focus
good high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than competition in class (396g)
57
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (588g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Sports photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography factors
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
has no phase detect AF
46
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
great battery power (540 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Travel photography info
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography info
67
supports touch to focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
more heavy than competition in class (396 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
55
great battery power (540 CIPA)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
pretty wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (588 grams)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Landscape photography details
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography details
79
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
48
has manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (540 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Vlogging details
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging details
33
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (396g)
63
pretty wide (25mm)
display is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with external microphone jack
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
more heavy than competition (588g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus OM-D E-M10Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2014-03-18 2012-07-18
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 81 23
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fully Articulated
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT LCD Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 1,440 thousand dot 1,312 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames per sec 12.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO100) 13.50 m
Flash modes Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 396 gr (0.87 lbs) 588 gr (1.30 lbs)
Physical dimensions 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 72 37
DXO Color Depth rating 22.8 19.1
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.3 10.8
DXO Low light rating 884 114
Other
Battery life 320 pictures 540 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $600 $499