Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e7/eb0e7d68430f7af24efc1c439232dbd28d053d73" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front"
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Launched July 2015
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M10 and Panasonic FZ300, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and FZ300 (12MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M10 was announced 16 months prior to the FZ300 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-M10 matches up vs the FZ300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 Gallery and Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Panasonic FZ300
E-M10 | FZ300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-M10
FZ300 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2015 | ![]() | March 2014 | Fresher by 16 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper screen (+3k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Panasonic FZ300
E-M10 | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 offers physical dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ300 has proportions of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") having a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 and Panasonic FZ300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 against the FZ300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07fd1/07fd117ba2e2a7b2b6368292d76478eca44e01f8" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and FZ300 is 82 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eface/eface5af75e5b216bb879db55ce8b806daf7b0e4" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The graphic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 and FZ300.
Plainly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 will give you more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-M10 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9737/c97374918dc59b7a4aedae9581ba31a428afcb39" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc86d/fc86dabbfa226a6c6d76670f7152c34966325242" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-03-18 | 2015-07-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396 grams (0.87 lbs) | 691 grams (1.52 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 380 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $600 | $598 |