Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb291/cb29125ece2d0ddb14a8839e9be01545bbca4b12" alt="Pentax K-3 II front Pentax K-3 II front"
59 Imaging
66 Features
84 Overall
73
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Launched March 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 131 x 100 x 77mm
- Launched April 2015
- Older Model is Pentax K-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and K-3 II (24MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and K-3 II (APS-C) come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M10 was released 13 months earlier than the K-3 II which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-3 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-M10 grades versus the K-3 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Pentax K-3 II. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 Gallery and Pentax K-3 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Pentax K-3 II
E-M10 | K-3 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-3 II over the Olympus E-M10
K-3 II | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2015 | ![]() | March 2014 | Fresher by 13 months |
Screen dimension | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Pentax K-3 II
E-M10 | K-3 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 1037k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 has got physical dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-3 II has specifications of 131mm x 100mm x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 vs the K-3 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea1f8/ea1f87438ecbae76200362d1364d086be5325d8d" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 and K-3 II is 82 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36860/3686080e88b9a9f999985eebdd23818eeec78283" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The graphic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 and K-3 II.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Pentax K-3 II will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-M10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7d7e/e7d7eb1f7e8d94e435ca7498333c8a4bf1d17ba8" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c770/3c77046876c3fb030c7823a121a2d922c362a438" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Pentax K-3 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Pentax K-3 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Pentax K-3 II |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2014-03-18 | 2015-04-23 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Prime III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6016 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 27 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 8.3 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync (available with dedicated external flash) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396g (0.87 lbs) | 800g (1.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 131 x 100 x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | 1106 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 720 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | 2 |
Retail cost | $600 | $829 |