Clicky

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh CX2

Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
73
Overall
61
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
 
Ricoh CX2 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Launched March 2014
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M10 II
Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced August 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview

Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh CX2, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and CX2 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 was launched 4 years later than the CX2 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M10 scores versus the CX2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Ricoh CX2

 E-M10 CX2 
IntroducedMarch 2014August 2009More recent by 56 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1037k920kSharper screen (+117k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus E-M10

 CX2 E-M10 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Ricoh CX2

 E-M10 CX2 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 has got outside measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh CX2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 compared to the CX2.

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and CX2 is 82 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 and CX2.

As you can see, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Portrait photography info
Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography info
71
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
supports RAW files
25
focusing manually
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
MP count low (9 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX2 as a Street photography camera
77
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
comes with focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than competitors in class (396 grams)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (185g)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Sports photography details
Ricoh CX2 Sports photography details
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect AF
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
MP count low (9MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Travel photography features
Ricoh CX2 Travel photography features
67
comes with focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
heavier than competitors in class (396g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
66
lighter than average (185g)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
MP count low (9MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh CX2 as a Landscape photography camera
79
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
42
focusing manually
pretty wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
MP count low (9 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX2 as a Vlogging camera
33
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (396g)
30
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (185 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 and Ricoh CX2
 Olympus OM-D E-M10Ricoh CX2
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Ricoh CX2
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2014-03-18 2009-08-20
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3456 x 2592
Max native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-300mm (10.7x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,037k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 1,440k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO100) 3.00 m (ISO 400)
Flash options Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 396 gr (0.87 pounds) 185 gr (0.41 pounds)
Dimensions 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 884 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-5 DB-70
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $600 $341