Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74efc/74efc246825aff5ab2faab7c06cfeb0ab333069a" alt="Ricoh G900 front Ricoh G900 front"
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Launched March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M10 versus Ricoh G900, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-M10 (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and G900 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M10 was revealed 4 years prior to the G900 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 matches up against the G900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 & Ricoh G900. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Ricoh G900
E-M10 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus E-M10
G900 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | March 2014 | More recent by 47 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper display (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Ricoh G900
E-M10 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 offers exterior dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Ricoh G900 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 versus Ricoh G900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 versus the G900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4916/b4916946df44dcfe8bfccea9365623d8e0b12774" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 and G900 is 82 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40c9f/40c9f332ccb33dc3c07d6b90209b19479d937900" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 and G900.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh G900 will result in greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-M10 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/654bc/654bc197d18b101767c8fa2ad2fdd544f0b7138a" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54ede/54ede4e53a17ea672856848ee5d7567c3d6fd43a" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Ricoh G900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Ricoh G900 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2014-03-18 | 2018-02-21 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Flash on, flash off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | Optional | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 396 grams (0.87 lb) | 247 grams (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 340 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $600 | $752 |