Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung HZ35W
82 Imaging
52 Features
73 Overall
60
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung HZ35W, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M10 was manufactured 3 years after the HZ35W which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-M10 matches up vs the HZ35W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Samsung HZ35W
| E-M10 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2014 | June 2010 | More modern by 46 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 614k | Sharper display (+423k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-M10
| HZ35W | E-M10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Samsung HZ35W
| E-M10 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 offers outside measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 against the HZ35W.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and HZ35W is 82 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The image here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 and HZ35W.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M10 will give extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | - | WB650 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-03-18 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 81 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 396g (0.87 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 884 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $600 | $300 |