Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d001/6d00199fa554daddf1699da91ea808290d954e81" alt="Samsung NX2000 front Samsung NX2000 front"
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Released March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Old Model is Samsung NX1100
- Replacement is Samsung NX3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-M10 and Samsung NX2000, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 (16MP) and the NX2000 (20MP) is relatively close but the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and NX2000 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M10 was introduced 4 months after the NX2000 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M10 matches up versus the NX2000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Samsung NX2000. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 Gallery and Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Samsung NX2000
E-M10 | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Olympus E-M10
NX2000 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.7" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Screen resolution | 1152k | ![]() | 1037k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Samsung NX2000
E-M10 | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2014 | ![]() | November 2013 | Same generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 features exterior dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Samsung NX2000 has dimensions of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 and Samsung NX2000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 against the NX2000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb802/cb8028598d398739ee2a5fb1783dd1398d244a54" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and NX2000 is 82 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3630/a3630bf3e97b6689c20d211379ccbceeaada0679" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The image below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 and NX2000.
Plainly, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX2000 will result in greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9769e/9769e50b3742a487937d232bbb93cc84a4b48ee6" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51b14/51b14a5a6e32507add38e02c4736101f12ced1f0" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Samsung NX2000 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-03-18 | 2013-11-30 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 1,152k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396 gr (0.87 lb) | 228 gr (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | 75 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 340 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $600 | $599 |