Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung TL350
82 Imaging
52 Features
73 Overall
60
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Released March 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Other Name is WB2000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung TL350: A Thorough Comparison for the Photography Enthusiast
When it comes to choosing a camera, the sheer variety can be overwhelming, especially when models hail from different categories - mirrorless vs compact, interchangeable lenses vs fixed lens. Today, I’m diving deep into two intriguing cameras from the mid-2010s: the Olympus OM-D E-M10, an entry-level mirrorless system camera, and the Samsung TL350 (also known as the WB2000), a compact point-and-shoot with a versatile zoom. Having spent hundreds of hours testing cameras across genres, I’ll walk you through their real-world performance and technology, so you can decide which fits your photography style and needs.

First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling
Let’s start with something you’ll immediately notice - the size and build. The Olympus E-M10 is a classic SLR-style mirrorless camera with a conventional grip, multiple physical controls, and the heft associated with interchangeable lens systems. Measuring roughly 119x82x46 mm and weighing around 396g (body alone), it strikes a balance - substantial enough to feel solid and precise yet compact for a mirrorless.
On the other hand, the Samsung TL350 is a pocketable compact at 100x59x22 mm and a mere 195g, designed for maximum portability and convenience with a fixed 24-120mm equivalent zoom lens. The tradeoff? A smaller sensor and fewer manual controls.
Handling wise, the E-M10’s textured grip and dedicated buttons make it easier to operate confidently for both beginners and enthusiasts who like direct access to settings. The TL350’s all-in-one design means fewer controls and reliance on menus - typical compact camera ergonomics. If you prefer physical dials and customizable control layouts, the Olympus feels like home; if size and slip-in-your-pocket convenience are paramount, Samsung has an edge.
Design Details Up Close: Top View Controls and User Interface
Now, I’ve been testing the E-M10’s control layout extensively, and it shines with its top-plate buttons and dials, including dedicated ISO, exposure compensation, and mode dial. It caters to photographers who want quick access without diving into menus. Moreover, the inclusion of an electronic viewfinder (EVF) – a rarity in entry-level models of the era – gives you a bright, detailed preview with 100% coverage and 1.44M-dot resolution. Very useful in daylight or when you need critical framing.
The Samsung TL350 lacks a viewfinder altogether, relying solely on its 3” fixed LCD. It has a simpler control setup, with fewer physical buttons and no dedicated dials; the zoom lever doubles as lens control. This is fine for casual shooting but limited for those who want faster manual adjustments.
The tactile response and button layout on the Olympus also reduce fumbling - good ergonomics that encourage creativity. Samsung’s fewer controls also mean less to learn but might frustrate photographers wanting more direct access.

Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
This is where the cameras take very different approaches, impacting their core photographic capabilities.
The Olympus E-M10 sports a Four Thirds-sized sensor measuring 17.3x13 mm and packing 16MP - a relatively large and modern CMOS sensor for an entry-level mirrorless camera back in 2014. This sensor is more capable in low light, produces cleaner images at higher ISO, and generally gives richer color depth and dynamic range. According to DxOMark, it scores a solid overall 72 with good color depth (22.8 bits) and dynamic range (12.3 EV).
On the smaller side, the Samsung TL350 uses a 1/2.3” sensor (6.08x4.56 mm) with only 10MP resolution. That’s a tiny sensor compared to the Olympus, limiting light-gathering ability, dynamic range, and noise performance. While the TL350 is respectable as a compact zoom camera, it cannot compete with the bigger sensor’s image quality, particularly in challenging lighting.
If you’re serious about photo quality - skin tones, low noise, or fine detail - the E-M10’s sensor will consistently outperform the TL350.

LCD and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shot
Display technologies greatly influence shooting experience. The Olympus E-M10 features a 3” tilting touchscreen LCD with 1,037K-dot resolution - plenty sharp and versatile for composing from high or low angles. The touchscreen capability helps with quick focusing and menu navigation, enhancing user-friendliness.
In contrast, the Samsung TL350 has a fixed 3” TFT LCD with 920K-dot resolution but no touch abilities. While the resolution is decent for its class, the lack of articulation and touchscreen feels dated, and absence of an EVF means framing in bright light can be tricky.
For photographers who rely on precise framing, the Olympus’ EVF plus articulating touchscreen gives a significant advantage in flexibility and reliability.

Image Gallery: Sample Images from Both Cameras
Seeing photos side by side tells us a lot. The Olympus E-M10 consistently delivers sharper images with natural colors and richer tonal gradations. Skin tones, crucial in portrait shooting, appear more lifelike. Backgrounds render smoothly with its Micro Four Thirds lenses providing appealing bokeh.
The Samsung TL350’s outputs are softer, with less dynamic range and more noticeable noise creeping in at ISO 800 and above. Colors lean toward being more contrasty and less nuanced.
Of course, the Samsung’s longer 24-120mm zoom gives it reach flexibility - useful for casual snapshots and travel - but expect compromise in sheer image quality.
Focusing Systems: Speed and Accuracy When It Matters
For active photography like sports or wildlife, autofocus speed and tracking reliability make or break the experience.
The Olympus E-M10 uses a contrast-detection AF system with 81 focus points and face detection. While contrast AF is generally slower than phase-detection systems, in my testing this camera was able to achieve decent tracking at 8fps continuous shooting. Eye detection helped portrait focusing accuracy, though not as advanced as modern mirrorless cameras with AI.
Samsung TL350 employs basic contrast AF with fewer focus points and no face detection. Tracking moving subjects is very limited. Burst shooting tops out at 10fps but without AF adjustment between shots, limiting usefulness for fast action.
For wildlife or sports shooters, I recommend the Olympus E-M10 - it’s more responsive and versatile with interchangeable lenses suited to telephoto needs. The TL350 is best for casual snaps rather than critical action shots.
Versatility and Lens Ecosystem: More Than Just a Camera Body
The Olympus’ Micro Four Thirds mount opens doors to over 100 native lenses and third-party options, covering everything from ultra-wide landscape lenses to long telephotos and dedicated macro optics. This ecosystem is one of the best values in mirrorless systems, allowing you to grow as a photographer without switching brands.
Samsung TL350’s fixed lens design means zero lens swapping options. The 24-120mm zoom lens is convenient but has a variable aperture (f/2.4-5.8) which limits low-light and bokeh capabilities.
If you see yourself exploring multiple genres - portraits, macro, sports - the Olympus makes more sense due to expandability.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations
I always test how long you can shoot during a busy day since nobody likes running out of power mid-adventure.
The E-M10’s battery delivers about 320 shots per charge, standard for its class but not exceptional. You can extend this with spares. It uses SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, which are universally available and affordable.
Samsung TL350’s battery life info isn’t explicitly stated, but compact cameras of this era typically yield fewer shots per charge (around 200-250) due to smaller batteries. It uses SD/SDHC cards and additionally has some internal storage, useful for emergency shots.
For extended travel or professional use, Olympus offers more reliable endurance and swap options.
Connectivity and Additional Features
The Olympus E-M10 includes built-in wireless (Wi-Fi) for quick image transfer and remote shooting - a significant plus for modern workflows and instant sharing. Samsung TL350 has no wireless features, making it less convenient if you want to quickly move photos to smartphones or cloud services.
Neither camera supports Bluetooth or NFC, which is unsurprising given their age.
Both offer HDMI output and USB 2.0 ports, but only Olympus supports external flash units, giving it another edge for creative lighting.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Durability
Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged construction, so don’t expect to shoot confidently in heavy rain or dusty field conditions without protection.
Olympus’ E-M10 has a robust metal body with a premium feel for an entry-level camera, while the Samsung TL350 is all plastic, typical of compacts.
If durability matters, the Olympus comes out ahead.
Video Capabilities: Worth Considering for Hybrid Shooters
The Olympus E-M10 can record Full HD 1080p video at 30fps using H.264 and Motion JPEG formats. It has sensor-based image stabilization, helping smooth footage. However, it lacks microphone or headphone ports, limiting audio control.
Samsung TL350 also records 1080p video at 30fps with H.264 format. It has optical image stabilization through the lens and similar audio limitations (no mic/headphone ports).
Both cameras suit casual video use but won’t replace dedicated video-centric cameras or newer mirrorless with 4K. Olympus’ stabilization tends to be slightly more effective due to sensor-based tech, though.
Specialized Photography Disciplines: Strengths and Weaknesses
Breaking it down by photography type, here’s how these cameras perform based on my extensive testing and field experience:
Portrait Photography
- Olympus: Better skin tone rendering, effective eye detection AF, ability to use fast primes for creamy bokeh.
- Samsung: Limited bokeh due to fixed zoom lens; softer images.
Landscape Photography
- Olympus: Larger sensor yields excellent dynamic range (12.3 EV), superior color depth, and flexibility with wide-angle lenses.
- Samsung: Small sensor limits dynamic range and resolution; less suited to demanding landscapes.
Wildlife Photography
- Olympus: Decent continuous AF and 8fps burst; can pair with telephoto lenses; reasonable tracking.
- Samsung: No real tracking; limited zoom reach; better suited to casual wildlife snapshots.
Sports Photography
- Olympus: Better focusing and burst capabilities but still entry-level; use with tele-zoom to capture action.
- Samsung: Burst speed is higher but AF limitations reduce effectiveness.
Street Photography
- Olympus: Slightly bulkier but still discreet, EVF is helpful; articulating screen aids shooting creativity.
- Samsung: Ultra-compact is ideal for inconspicuous shooting; fixed lens covers popular focal lengths.
Macro Photography
- Olympus: Focus precision and optional macro lenses give superior results.
- Samsung: Minimum focus distance of 5 cm is respectable but limitations of fixed lens and sensor.
Night and Astro Photography
- Olympus: Larger sensor and native ISO starting at 200, with multiplex exposure modes, excel here.
- Samsung: Small sensor struggles with noise at high ISO; max ISO 3200 helps but image quality suffers.
Video
- Both provide stable 1080p at 30fps; Olympus has sensor stabilization, Samsung lens stabilization.
- Neither supports external microphones.
Travel Photography
- Olympus: More versatile with lenses, serviceable battery life, and good image quality but larger and heavier.
- Samsung: Perfect pocket-size; simple zoom; decent image quality for snapshots.
Professional Work
- Olympus: Supports RAW capture, has manual controls, Wi-Fi for transfer, and external flash compatibility.
- Samsung: RAW supported but limited manual features and no wireless connectivity.
Value and Pricing: What Do You Get for Your Dollars?
At launch, the Olympus E-M10 was priced around $600 body-only, giving excellent value for entry-level mirrorless with advanced features. Its Micro Four Thirds mount, larger sensor, and more sophisticated controls justify the premium.
Samsung TL350 launched near $400 but is now discontinued and reflective of early 2010s compact tech. Its smaller sensor and lack of key features mean the lower price fits casual users who prioritize size.
Your budget and photography ambitions will guide the choice: serious image quality and creative flexibility? Olympus. Ultra-compact simplicity and zoom convenience? Samsung.
Conclusion: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Both the Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Samsung TL350 have their merits, but they cater to distinctly different photographers.
If you value image quality, manual control, and system expandability - and don’t mind a slightly larger body - the Olympus E-M10 is the clear winner. It performs capably across all major disciplines, from portraits to landscape, and even sports with the right lens. Its 16MP Four Thirds sensor and better ergonomics make shooting a rewarding experience.
The Samsung TL350 appeals to users who want a highly portable camera with an all-in-one zoom, minimal fuss, and simpler operation. It’s a solid grab-and-go travel or street camera for casual shooting but can’t match the Olympus in technical or creative flexibility.
In my experience, investing in a mirrorless system like the E-M10 offers you a future-proof platform that grows with your skills. Meanwhile, the TL350 can be a reliable backup or a starter compact for beginners prioritizing convenience.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
- Portrait lovers: Olympus E-M10 with fast primes is your best bet.
- Travel photographers wanting pocketability: Samsung TL350’s slim profile is convenient.
- Landscape and night shooters: Olympus for superior sensor tech and dynamic range.
- Wildlife and sports photographers needing autofocus and burst: Olympus shines.
- Budget-conscious beginners wanting simplicity: Samsung covers basic needs well.
- Enthusiasts wanting a flexible system: Olympus offers upgrade paths including lenses, flashes, and accessories.
Dear readers, I hope this hands-on, detail-oriented comparison helps you avoid buyer’s remorse. Selecting gear aligned with your style will dramatically improve your photography journey. If you have further questions on lenses or specific shooting conditions, just ask!
Note: All opinions and technical data stem from my personal testing benchmarks combined with trusted lab results. Photography gear is deeply personal, and the right tool is one that inspires you to create.
Happy shooting!
Olympus E-M10 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Samsung TL350 |
| Also called as | - | WB2000 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-03-18 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 81 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 5.20 m |
| Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 396 gr (0.87 lbs) | 195 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 884 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $600 | $400 |