Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61


83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Announced March 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Announced February 2012
- Replaced the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- New Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Olympus E-M10 versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.

The E-M10 was announced 2 years later than the DP2 Merrill and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M10 grades versus the DP2 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
E-M10 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | More recent by 26 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Olympus E-M10
DP2 Merrill | E-M10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
E-M10 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 has exterior measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 compared to the DP2 Merrill.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 and DP2 Merrill is 82 and 83 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through specifications. The visual here will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 and DP2 Merrill.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 will produce greater detail with its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-03-18 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640x480 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396 gr (0.87 lbs) | 330 gr (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $600 | $931 |