Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0798d/0798ddacd7eeb1289b58370a77a8d66bd4ccddbb" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Launched March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-M10 versus Sony A290, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 (16MP) and the A290 (14MP) is very close but the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and A290 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M10 was announced 3 years after the A290 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M10 scores against the A290 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 Gallery & Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Sony A290
E-M10 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 46 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus E-M10
A290 | E-M10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Sony A290
E-M10 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 features outer dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Sony A290 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 versus Sony A290 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 and the A290.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92047/92047498ab102ca66b05e8b4bec2f365df729bec" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 and A290 is 82 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abfe4/abfe41592878541603b190c21a0ab799e95fe292" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The image underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 and A290.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 having a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Olympus E-M10 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images far more aggressively. The younger E-M10 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85239/852394ef996a8852cd81ac872d9b3175c893de71" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/745b3/745b346875b40b1d2772bf57c3075ed63d1744c5" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony A290 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2014-03-18 | 2010-06-09 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396 grams (0.87 pounds) | 549 grams (1.21 pounds) |
Dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | 615 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 290 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $600 | $600 |