Clicky

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
73
Overall
61
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Released March 2014
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 II
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Introduced March 2016
  • Replaced the Sony RX10 II
  • Replacement is Sony RX10 IV
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M10 and Sony RX10 III, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M10 (16MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") have totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 was introduced 24 months earlier than the RX10 III making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-M10 scores vs the RX10 III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Sony RX10 III

 E-M10 RX10 III 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-M10

 RX10 III E-M10 
IntroducedMarch 2016March 2014Fresher by 24 months
Display resolution1229k1037kClearer display (+192k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Sony RX10 III

 E-M10 RX10 III 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 has exterior measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") having a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M10 and Sony RX10 III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 vs the RX10 III.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and RX10 III is 82 and 53 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 and RX10 III.

As you can plainly see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 using its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Sony RX10 III will give extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-M10 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10
Portrait photography with Sony RX10 III
71
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
71
focusing manually
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (1")
provides face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Street photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Street photography camera
77
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
supports touch focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than competition (396 grams)
64
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
nice sensor size (1")
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
heavier than average in class (1,051g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10
Sports photography with Sony RX10 III
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
no phase detect AF
70
incredible zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet shooting (1/32,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (1")
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
better than average battery life (420 shots)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Travel photography info
Sony RX10 III Travel photography info
67
supports touch focus
good resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
more heavy than competition (396 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
55
better than average battery life (420 per charge)
environment sealing
MP count good (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (600mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than average in class (1,051 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Landscape photography camera
79
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
63
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (1")
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
better than average battery life (420 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Vlogging details
Sony RX10 III Vlogging details
33
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than competition (396g)
28
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
includes external mic socket
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
display is not selfie friendly
heavier than average in class (1,051 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 and Sony RX10 III
 Olympus OM-D E-M10Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Superzoom
Released 2014-03-18 2016-03-29
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 25600 12800
Max enhanced ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 200 125
RAW pictures
Minimum enhanced ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 81 25
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-600mm (25.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.7
Screen
Display type Tilting Tilting
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 1,440 thousand dots 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x 0.7x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Fastest quiet shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shutter rate 8.0 frames/s 14.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO100) 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 396 gr (0.87 lb) 1051 gr (2.32 lb)
Physical dimensions 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 72 70
DXO Color Depth rating 22.8 23.1
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.3 12.6
DXO Low light rating 884 472
Other
Battery life 320 pictures 420 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $600 $1,398