Clicky

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
73
Overall
61
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
76
Features
65
Overall
71

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Released March 2014
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 II
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Launched October 2015
  • Previous Model is Sony RX1R
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M10 versus Sony RX1R II, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and RX1R II (Full frame) offer different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-M10 was introduced 19 months prior to the RX1R II making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-M10 grades versus the RX1R II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Sony RX1R II

 E-M10 RX1R II 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus E-M10

 RX1R II E-M10 
LaunchedOctober 2015March 2014Newer by 19 months
Display resolution1229k1037kCrisper display (+192k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Sony RX1R II

 E-M10 RX1R II 
Manually focus More exact focus
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

When you are looking to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 comes with outside measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) and the Sony RX1R II has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M10 versus Sony RX1R II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 and the RX1R II.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 and RX1R II is 82 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The pic below may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 and RX1R II.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony RX1R II will render more detail using its extra 26 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-M10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Portrait photography camera
71
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
85
focusing manually
above average flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
amazing megapixels (42MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
provides face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10
Street photography with Sony RX1R II
77
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
features touch focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than competition in class (396 grams)
73
screen tilts
sensor size is large (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
above average high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than average (507 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Sports photography details
Sony RX1R II Sports photography details
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
has no phase detect autofocus
63
amazing megapixels (42MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
provides tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect autofocus
focal length is fixed (35mm)
slow fps (5.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low battery life (220 shots)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Travel photography highlights
Sony RX1R II Travel photography highlights
67
features touch focus
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
heavier than competition in class (396 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
59
amazing megapixels (42MP)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
no Timelapse function
low battery life (220 per charge)
more heavy than average (507 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Landscape photography camera
79
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
68
focusing manually
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
amazing megapixels (42 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
does not have image stabilization
low battery life (220 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Vlogging information
Sony RX1R II Vlogging information
33
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external mic port
heavier than competition in class (396 grams)
34
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
provides face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have external microphone socket
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than average (507g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 and Sony RX1R II
 Olympus OM-D E-M10Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Released 2014-03-18 2015-10-13
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII BIONZ X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 42MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 7952 x 5304
Highest native ISO 25600 25600
Highest enhanced ISO - 102400
Min native ISO 200 50
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 81 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35mm (1x)
Highest aperture - f/2.0
Macro focus distance - 14cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Type of display Tilting Tilting
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 1,440 thousand dots 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 8.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO100) no built-in flash
Flash options Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 396 grams (0.87 lbs) 507 grams (1.12 lbs)
Physical dimensions 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 72 97
DXO Color Depth score 22.8 25.8
DXO Dynamic range score 12.3 13.9
DXO Low light score 884 3204
Other
Battery life 320 shots 220 shots
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-5 NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots One One
Retail price $600 $3,300