Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
78 Imaging
76 Features
65 Overall
71
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Released March 2014
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Launched October 2015
- Previous Model is Sony RX1R
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M10 versus Sony RX1R II, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and RX1R II (Full frame) offer different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M10 was introduced 19 months prior to the RX1R II making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-M10 grades versus the RX1R II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 Gallery and Sony RX1R II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Sony RX1R II
E-M10 | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus E-M10
RX1R II | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2015 | March 2014 | Newer by 19 months | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 1037k | Crisper display (+192k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Sony RX1R II
E-M10 | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 comes with outside measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) and the Sony RX1R II has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 versus Sony RX1R II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 and the RX1R II.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 and RX1R II is 82 and 78 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The pic below may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 and RX1R II.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony RX1R II will render more detail using its extra 26 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-M10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-03-18 | 2015-10-13 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 42MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7952 x 5304 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 50 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 14cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 396 grams (0.87 lbs) | 507 grams (1.12 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | 97 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 25.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | 13.9 |
DXO Low light score | 884 | 3204 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 220 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $600 | $3,300 |