Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40be7/40be73101854ff246c4cb2cbf4bced3a90580f23" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front"
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Announced March 2014
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M10 was unveiled 5 years after the T900 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-M10 grades versus the T900 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Sony T900
E-M10 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2014 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 62 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 922k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-M10
T900 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Sony T900
E-M10 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 offers outside measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") and a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) and the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 versus the T900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c98d1/c98d1645efe82544efbfc2b67b9db7a43e7b97c4" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and T900 is 82 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4519a/4519aa357631d47be1251a2736c3e63d83d27aa3" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The image below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 and T900.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 will resolve more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdc18/bdc182265050ffc6505fb6da16d1c84aad98326c" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27cba/27cbad0b0beb0ed589aba3f82f1b8e01e5a5f9c6" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2014-03-18 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 396g (0.87 pounds) | 143g (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $600 | $300 |