Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73


72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-M1X versus Olympus SP-565UZ, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

The E-M1X was revealed 10 years after the SP-565UZ which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-M1X scores against the SP-565UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Olympus SP-565UZ. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M1X | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2019 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 123 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-M1X
SP-565UZ | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M1X | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1X has got outer measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1X versus Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1X and the SP-565UZ.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and SP-565UZ is 54 and 72 respectively.

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching a spec sheet. The picture here may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1X and SP-565UZ.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1X with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1X will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher E-M1X should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2019-01-24 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997 gr (2.20 lb) | 413 gr (0.91 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 images | - |
Battery format | Built-in | - |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Pricing at launch | $2,999 | $400 |