Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-M1X versus Olympus SP-565UZ, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1X was revealed 10 years after the SP-565UZ which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-M1X scores against the SP-565UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Olympus SP-565UZ. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M1X | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2019 | January 2009 | Newer by 123 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-M1X
SP-565UZ | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M1X | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus |
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1X has got outer measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1X versus Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1X and the SP-565UZ.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and SP-565UZ is 54 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching a spec sheet. The picture here may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1X and SP-565UZ.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1X with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1X will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher E-M1X should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2019-01-24 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997 gr (2.20 lb) | 413 gr (0.91 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 images | - |
Battery format | Built-in | - |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Pricing at launch | $2,999 | $400 |