Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5b1/2c5b1898c62d7f187c0d40fb1eefb6649a2b2e72" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1X front Olympus OM-D E-M1X front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0063/e00637e5677671b8b72fa1976b25d95bb3a79c37" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ front Olympus SP-810 UZ front"
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Released July 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-800 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1X versus Olympus SP-810 UZ, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1X was released 7 years later than the SP-810 UZ and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-M1X matches up vs the SP-810 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Olympus SP-810 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-M1X | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2019 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 92 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus E-M1X
SP-810 UZ | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-M1X | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1X enjoys physical dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) and the Olympus SP-810 UZ has proportions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1X versus Olympus SP-810 UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1X against the SP-810 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e856/2e8563705615ee71bf620a2d7659ab0e7e23be20" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1X and SP-810 UZ is 54 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34fc5/34fc516c30952786efe41002f6b8f68237767818" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The graphic here will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and SP-810 UZ.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1X featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1X will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images more aggressively. The fresher E-M1X will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d005/8d0051e54d768c993487fa4bcb887ae4e169aef0" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08618/086182fcd75c38db471fa85b39e8fcaf7f44651f" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus SP-810 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus SP-810 UZ |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2019-01-24 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-864mm (36.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.9-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1200s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 0.7 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.20 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997 gr (2.20 pounds) | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | - |
Battery format | Built-in | - |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at launch | $2,999 | $280 |