Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
![Olympus OM-D E-M1X front Olympus OM-D E-M1X front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-OM-D-E-M1X/Olympus-E-M1X-front.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-850-iHS/Olympus-TG-850-iHS-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus TG-850 iHS, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The E-M1X was manufactured 5 years later than the TG-850 iHS and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M1X scores vs the TG-850 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-M1X | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2019 | ![]() | January 2014 | Fresher by 61 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-M1X
TG-850 iHS | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-M1X | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1X has physical measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-850 iHS has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus TG-850 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1X versus the TG-850 iHS.
![Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-OM-D-E-M1X-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-850-iHS-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and TG-850 iHS is 54 and 91 respectively.
![Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-OM-D-E-M1X-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-850-iHS-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The graphic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1X and TG-850 iHS.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1X featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1X will show more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M1X will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
![Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-OM-D-E-M1X-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-850-iHS-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-OM-D-E-M1X-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-850-iHS-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2019-01-24 | 2014-01-29 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4616 x 3464 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997 grams (2.20 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 shots | 330 shots |
Type of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Pricing at launch | $2,999 | $250 |