Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1X versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1X was manufactured 5 years later than the TG-2 iHS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M1X grades vs the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M1X | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2019 | June 2013 | Fresher by 68 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 610k | Clearer screen (+427k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M1X
TG-2 iHS | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M1X | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1X enjoys outer dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has specifications of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1X versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1X vs the TG-2 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1X and TG-2 iHS is 54 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The visual below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and TG-2 iHS.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1X because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will offer you greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2019-01-24 | 2013-06-28 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 610k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997 grams (2.20 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | 350 photographs |
Battery style | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Card slots | Two | Single |
Pricing at release | $2,999 | $380 |