Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-320
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1X versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1X was released 7 years later than the VR-320 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M1X matches up against the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Olympus VR-320
E-M1X | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2019 | July 2011 | More recent by 92 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-M1X
VR-320 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus VR-320
E-M1X | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1X features outside dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1X versus Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1X compared to the VR-320.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1X and VR-320 is 54 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and VR-320.
All in all, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1X because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1X will offer more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2019-01-24 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997 grams (2.20 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photos | - |
Battery format | Built-in | - |
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Price at launch | $2,999 | $179 |