Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-330
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-330, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and VR-330 (14MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1X was manufactured 8 years later than the VR-330 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-M1X scores against the VR-330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Olympus VR-330. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Olympus VR-330
E-M1X | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2019 | February 2011 | More recent by 97 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-M1X
VR-330 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus VR-330
E-M1X | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1X has external measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1X against the VR-330.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1X and VR-330 is 54 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through a spec sheet. The visual below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1X and VR-330.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1X featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will provide extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more modern E-M1X will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Olympus VR-330 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2019-01-24 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997 gr (2.20 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 pictures | - |
Battery style | Built-in | - |
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Cost at release | $2,999 | $220 |