Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5b1/2c5b1898c62d7f187c0d40fb1eefb6649a2b2e72" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1X front Olympus OM-D E-M1X front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic ZS200, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M1X (20MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") use totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1X was announced 12 months after the ZS200 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-M1X matches up versus the ZS200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic ZS200
E-M1X | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2019 | ![]() | February 2018 | More modern by 12 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-M1X
ZS200 | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 1037k | Sharper display (+203k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic ZS200
E-M1X | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1X features outside measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1X compared to the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99589/995894da51b8d6ef3ab7c151632fe93bbc5ac1cd" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1X and ZS200 is 54 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/071cf/071cf0f3d70c5453557e6443feeb3ae883e2990b" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1X and ZS200.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer the same exact megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The E-M1X provides the larger sensor which will make achieving bokeh less difficult. The newer E-M1X will have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b5a5/8b5a58e4ea3273e483516815f5dea8b94fc410ec" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79d87/79d877396cbcf2df10cad5ac38e0cd3d7d02f842" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2019-01-24 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | Yes |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997g (2.20 pounds) | 340g (0.75 pounds) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | 370 photographs |
Style of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Price at launch | $2,999 | $800 |