Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5b1/2c5b1898c62d7f187c0d40fb1eefb6649a2b2e72" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1X front Olympus OM-D E-M1X front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58c53/58c53fd189a0b402571d0bfc738fe9c100c02101" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 front"
94 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 152g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FH27, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and FH27 (16MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and FH27 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1X was manufactured 8 years later than the FH27 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH27 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M1X matches up against the FH27 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Panasonic FH27 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic FH27
E-M1X | FH27 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2019 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 99 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH27 over the Olympus E-M1X
FH27 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FH27
E-M1X | FH27 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1X features exterior measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH27 has sizing of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FH27 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1X and the FH27.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e07d0/e07d007cf93dc41de2445f95280b025442011dae" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and FH27 is 54 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a96bf/a96bf324fa923ba3e708c54d2208affb3913aee6" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The graphic here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1X and FH27.
All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1X because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will render more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M1X should have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f69a8/f69a85057cece246bdbdc13ce1dc756945915dd8" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c09a7/c09a71cb37c8e487a5d9ea3ca57532f4ccd949de" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FH27 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2019-01-24 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997 grams (2.20 lbs) | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photos | 250 photos |
Battery type | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Price at release | $2,999 | $229 |