Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX48
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX40
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M1X versus Panasonic FX48, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and FX48 (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and FX48 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1X was released 10 years later than the FX48 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX48 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M1X matches up against the FX48 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic FX48
E-M1X | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2019 | January 2009 | More recent by 122 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Olympus E-M1X
FX48 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FX48
E-M1X | FX48 |
---|
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1X comes with outer dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX48 has measurements of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1X versus Panasonic FX48 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1X compared to the FX48.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1X and FX48 is 54 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The photograph here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and FX48.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1X because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2019-01-24 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/3000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997g (2.20 pounds) | 150g (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photos | - |
Battery type | Built-in | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Pricing at release | $2,999 | $325 |