Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5b1/2c5b1898c62d7f187c0d40fb1eefb6649a2b2e72" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1X front Olympus OM-D E-M1X front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc5a2/dc5a23e639490cb05b989f13eba4ea99bfc355d5" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 149g - 102 x 56 x 22mm
- Introduced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FX90, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and FX90 (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and FX90 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1X was launched 7 years after the FX90 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX90 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-M1X scores versus the FX90 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Panasonic FX90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic FX90
E-M1X | FX90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2019 | ![]() | August 2011 | More modern by 91 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX90 over the Olympus E-M1X
FX90 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FX90
E-M1X | FX90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1X features external measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX90 has dimensions of 102mm x 56mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FX90 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M1X versus the FX90.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a3f7/3a3f7d31ff70bcf7a8f93f4d5a2fdc38c6da2cd5" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1X and FX90 is 54 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58066/58066bf2b4c38c6d8175754b18857f194c8b016d" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing specs. The picture underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1X and FX90.
All in all, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1X featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1X will show greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images more aggressively. The newer E-M1X provides an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b2ea/2b2ead1e2a33989859e8b231e22d07d582914705" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c958/1c958ddb6f2229aa5f3f84e4e3c7f14f04b789a2" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX90 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2019-01-24 | 2011-08-26 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.90 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997 gr (2.20 lbs) | 149 gr (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 102 x 56 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 shots | 200 shots |
Battery type | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Launch cost | $2,999 | $227 |