Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5b1/2c5b1898c62d7f187c0d40fb1eefb6649a2b2e72" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1X front Olympus OM-D E-M1X front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdd51/cdd51cf2d542515b3ba6c6c81eb98dc3a189d634" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front"
53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Launched January 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Released September 2016
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FZ2500, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M1X (20MP) and the FZ2500 (20MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") feature different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M1X was unveiled 2 years later than the FZ2500 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M1X scores versus the FZ2500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic FZ2500
E-M1X | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2019 | ![]() | September 2016 | More recent by 29 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-M1X
FZ2500 | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Sharper display (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FZ2500
E-M1X | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1X has physical dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FZ2500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1X and the FZ2500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b3bd/9b3bd9fbb1b62d6bcf695bc8f57e6a579c427730" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1X and FZ2500 is 54 and 53 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3344/a334418ad3da7c027db4c6f68f1adac864d43c09" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through specs. The graphic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and FZ2500.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got the exact same megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The E-M1X provides the larger sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF easier. The fresher E-M1X should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46ba5/46ba5ad2c9696a5a7aa77e6f4be0ea64845b804a" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eb18/7eb18c5d9072052f4588e2969d89ffe772cb61a3" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2019-01-24 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997g (2.20 pounds) | 915g (2.02 pounds) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 pictures | 350 pictures |
Style of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Launch pricing | $2,999 | $998 |