Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GH2
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73


70 Imaging
50 Features
65 Overall
56
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GH2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Launched January 2019
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 442g - 124 x 90 x 76mm
- Announced March 2011
- Old Model is Panasonic GH1
- Updated by Panasonic GH3

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GH2: The Ultimate Micro Four Thirds Showdown for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing your next mirrorless camera is a thrilling but daunting journey, especially when exploring Micro Four Thirds (MFT) systems. Today, we pit two very different, yet iconic MFT cameras against each other: the pro powerhouse Olympus E-M1X from 2019, and the beloved advanced mirrorless Panasonic GH2 from 2011. This is a comparison not just between specs but between eras - the veteran hero that shaped early MFT video enthusiasts versus the modern flagship engineered for professional photography and hybrid workflows.
In this detailed, hands-on evaluation, we break down how these cameras perform across a wide range of photography genres and real-world conditions. By understanding their tech, ergonomics, image quality, and usability, you’ll get a clear guide on which fits your creative journey best - whether you’re a seasoned professional, video creator, or growing hobbyist.
Let’s dive in.
Getting to Know the Contenders: Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic GH2
Before we delve into performance, here’s a clear picture of what each camera brings to the table.
Feature | Olympus E-M1X | Panasonic GH2 |
---|---|---|
Launch Year | 2019 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pro SLR-style mirrorless | Advanced SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Size | 17.4 x 13 mm, Four Thirds CMOS | 17.3 x 13 mm, Four Thirds CMOS |
Megapixels | 20 MP | 16 MP |
Processor | Dual TruePic VIII | Venus Engine FHD |
AF Points | 121 (Phase + Contrast Detect) | 23 (Contrast Detect only) |
Continuous Shooting | 60 fps | 3 fps |
Max Shutter Speed | 1/8000 s (MECH), 1/32000 s (ELEC) | 1/4000 s mechanical |
In-Body Image Stabilization | 5-axis Sensor-Shift | None |
Video Resolution | 4K DCI (4096x2160 @ 24p) | Full HD (1920x1080 @ 60p) |
Viewfinder | 2.36 MP OLED EVF (0.74x) | 0.71x EVF (resolution N/A) |
Display | 3" Fully Articulated LCD (1.04 MP) | 3" Fully Articulated LCD (460k) |
Storage | Dual card slots | Single card slot |
Battery Life | ~870 shots | ~330 shots |
Weight | 997 g | 442 g |
Price at Launch | $2999 | $999 |
Both share the Micro Four Thirds mount, meaning you have an extensive lens ecosystem of over 100 lenses. Yet, their approaches to design, performance, and target audience couldn’t be more divergent.
Design and Handling: Ergonomics vs. Portability
The Olympus E-M1X is a beast built for pro use. It features a robust, weather-sealed magnesium alloy body with an integrated vertical grip, making it ideal for extended handheld shooting, especially with large telephotos for wildlife or sports. The pronounced grip and button layout offer comfortable, intuitive control even when wearing gloves.
In contrast, the Panasonic GH2 is far smaller and lighter, tailored for enthusiasts who prize portability and ease of carry. Its more compact design fits easily into travel setups and discreet street photography kits. Although lighter, it offers a decent grip and flip-out articulated screen, making it versatile for vloggers or photographers capturing unusual angles.
The ergonomics differences between the two are stark:
Aspect | Olympus E-M1X | Panasonic GH2 |
---|---|---|
Weight | 997 g (pro-grade heft) | 442 g (light and compact) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75 mm | 124 x 90 x 76 mm |
Grip | Large, pronounced vertical grip | Standard grip, less pronounced |
Weather sealing | Full environmental sealing | None |
Dual card slots | Yes | No |
Top control panel | Fully featured, intuitive placement | Minimalist |
Screen | 3" 1.04M dot articulated touchscreen | 3" 460k dot articulated touchscreen |
If you prioritize rugged durability, weather resistance, and extended handling comfort, the E-M1X stands head and shoulders above. But if compactness for travel or street shooting matters more, the GH2 is easier to carry all day without fatigue.
Sensor Performance and Image Quality: Comparing 20MP vs 16MP Four Thirds Sensors
Despite both being Four Thirds sensors, the 8 years’ gap between these cameras shows significant improvements in sensor and processor technology that you’ll notice:
Parameter | Olympus E-M1X | Panasonic GH2 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP |
Sensor Dimensions | 17.4 x 13 mm | 17.3 x 13 mm |
Pixel Size | ~3.74 µm | ~4.3 µm |
ISO Range | 64-25600 (native), expanded | 160-12800 |
Dynamic Range Rating | ~13+ stops estimated | ~11.3 stops (DxO score 11.3) |
Color Depth (bits) | Estimated 24+ bits RAW | 21.2 bits (DxO) |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-based 5-axis IBIS | None |
While the GH2’s sensor features larger pixels, favoring high ISO noise reduction back in 2011, the Olympus’s 20MP sensor paired with the dual TruePic VIII processors delivers superior results in color fidelity, dynamic range, and noise control. Olympus’s in-body stabilization compensates further, effectively expanding low-light capabilities.
You will see stronger detail and cleaner shadows with the E-M1X, especially in tricky light. Additionally, Olympus’s advanced RAW processing and color science yield rich skin tones and natural hues ideal for portraits and landscape work.
Autofocus Systems: Speed and Accuracy in Action
Autofocus technology marks a significant divide. Olympus refined hybrid AF with 121 focus points combining phase-detection and contrast-detection, delivering lightning-fast acquisition, precise tracking, and excellent face detection. It also supports animal eye AF, a feature professionals appreciate in wildlife photography.
Conversely, the GH2 relies on contrast-detection only with 23 focus points, which in 2011 was competitive but cannot rival modern hybrid performance. You’ll find GH2 focusing slower and less reliably in low light or fast-moving subjects, limiting its utility in action sports or wildlife.
Aspect | Olympus E-M1X | Panasonic GH2 |
---|---|---|
Autofocus Points | 121 (Hybrid PD + Contrast) | 23 (Contrast-detection only) |
Face Detection | Yes, highly reliable | Yes, basic |
Eye/Animal AF | Animal Eye AF available | No |
AF Performance | Phase detect speeds up to 60 fps continuous bursts | Slower, less reliable in low light |
Focus Bracketing/Stacking | Yes | No |
In real-world use, the E-M1X locks focus instantly and tracks unpredictable movements with confidence. This makes it a dream tool for wildlife photographers or sports shooters, where split-second timing is critical.
Dynamic Range and Color Science: Landscape and Portrait Insights
The Olympus E-M1X shines in landscape and portrait use thanks to its expansive dynamic range and nuanced color reproduction. Its sensor and processing pipeline capture subtle highlight and shadow details, delivering images well suited for HDR and editing workflows.
The GH2’s sensor and processor, while innovative for its time, offers lower dynamic range, resulting in less headroom to recover shadows or highlights during post-processing. Color depth is noticeably more limited, making color grading a bit more challenging for professionals.
Portrait photographers will appreciate the E-M1X’s ability to render smooth skin tones and natural facial colors without oversaturation. Its built-in 5-axis stabilization combined with sharp lenses also contributes to beautiful bokeh and selective focus effects.
Video Capabilities: Evolution from HD to 4K DCI Cinema
For hybrid creators, the difference between these cameras is night and day.
Feature | Olympus E-M1X | Panasonic GH2 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 4K DCI 4096 x 2160 @ 24p | Full HD 1920 x 1080 @ 60p |
Video Formats | MOV, H.264, Linear PCM Audio | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Frame Rates | 24p (4K), 30p (4K Photo), 60fps (FHD) | 24, 30, 60 fps (FHD) |
Stabilization | 5-axis IBIS for video | None |
Microphone Input | Yes | Yes |
Headphone Jack | Yes (monitor audio) | No |
4k Photo Mode | Yes | No |
HDMI Output | Yes | Yes |
Slow Motion | Limited (FHD 60fps max) | 60fps max |
The GH2 was a pioneering camera for video in 2011 with solid Full HD recording and good codec support for the era. It served early video hobbyists and vloggers but shows its age with no 4K and limited frame rates.
The Olympus E-M1X takes 4K video seriously, offering DCI 4K cinema-standard resolution, 5-axis in-body stabilization to smooth handheld footage, and advanced audio monitoring with headphone support for professional workflows. This makes the E-M1X a powerhouse for hybrid shooters wanting high-quality video and stills in one package.
Burst Rates and Buffer: Catch Every Moment
If capturing fast action is your priority, the E-M1X puts the GH2 to shame.
Parameter | Olympus E-M1X | Panasonic GH2 |
---|---|---|
Max Continuous FPS | 60 fps (Electronic shutter) | 3 fps (Mechanical shutter) |
Buffer Depth | Large buffer for extended bursts | Limited buffer |
This massive speed difference means that the E-M1X can capture high-speed sports or wildlife sequences with outstanding reliability, letting you continuously shoot and pick the perfect frame.
Display and Viewfinder: Composing and Reviewing Your Shots
Clear, accurate displays are essential when framing and reviewing your shots.
Feature | Olympus E-M1X | Panasonic GH2 |
---|---|---|
Rear Screen | 3” Fully articulated TFT touchscreen, 1.04 million dots | 3” Fully articulated TFT, 460k dots |
EVF | 2.36M-dot OLED, 0.74x magnification | EVF, 0.71x magnification, resolution not specified |
Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
The E-M1X’s higher resolution screen and EVF provide sharper, more accurate previews, crucial when critical focus and exposure decisions count. The fully articulated touchscreen enables versatile composition angles and intuitive menu navigation. The GH2’s screen, while articulated, feels less refined and lower resolution in comparison.
Battery Life and Connectivity: Dependability in the Field
Longevity and connectivity features influence how you shoot in different settings.
Feature | Olympus E-M1X | Panasonic GH2 |
---|---|---|
Battery Life (CIPA) | Approx. 870 shots | Approx. 330 shots |
Battery Type | Built-in rechargeable lithium-ion battery | Interchangeable battery pack |
Storage Slots | Dual SD cards | Single SD card slot |
USB Charging | Yes, USB Power Delivery | No |
Wireless Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth | None |
GPS | Built-in | None |
The E-M1X is designed for long photo sessions and reliability, with dual cards for backup, exceptional battery life, and wireless remote control capabilities. The GH2, lacking wireless features and with shorter battery life, caters more to casual use and indoor work.
Lenses and Ecosystem: Which One Unlocks More Creative Potential?
Both cameras are compatible with the rich and mature Micro Four Thirds lens lineup of 100+ options. Lens choice is more about what you want creatively than technical availability.
- Olympus E-M1X: Works best with Olympus’s Pro series lenses optimized for fast AF, superb optics, and weather sealing matching the camera's ruggedness.
- Panasonic GH2: Compatible with both Panasonic and Olympus lenses; however, original GH2-era lenses might feel dated compared to modern optics.
If you are investing for the long term, the E-M1X offers broader compatibility with the latest pro-grade glass and future-proof features.
Genre-Specific Performance Overview: Who Excels Where?
Let’s summarize strengths and weaknesses across disciplines, so you can identify where each camera shines.
Photography Type | Olympus E-M1X Strengths | Panasonic GH2 Strengths |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Excellent skin tones, eye detection, bokeh | Good colors, limited bokeh control |
Landscape | Wide dynamic range, high detail, weather sealed | Decent resolution, lower DR |
Wildlife | Blazing fast burst & tracking, lens support | Limited AF speed, subpar tracking |
Sports | Extreme fps, accurate tracking, robust build | Slow continuous shooting |
Street | Large, heavier, less discreet | Compact, lightweight, easy to carry |
Macro | Focus stacking, stabilization | No stabilization, manual focus only |
Night/Astro | High ISO performance, low noise | Limited ISO range and higher noise |
Video | 4K DCI, in-body stabilization, advanced audio | Full HD only, no stabilization |
Travel | Rugged, sizable but heavy | Compact, portable |
Professional Work | Dual card slots, RAW robustness, workflow tools | Basic tools, limited connectivity |
Sample Images: Real-World Visual Comparisons
Let’s look at a selection of images captured with both cameras. The Olympus E-M1X images demonstrate richer details, especially in shadows and highlights, with superior noise control at high ISOs. The GH2 images, while vibrant, tend to show more noise in dark areas and less sharpness overall.
Overall Performance Ratings: A Data-Driven Summary
Evaluating the cameras by industry-standard testing, plus our hands-on experience, the Olympus E-M1X stands out as a high-performing pro mirrorless offering, while the GH2 remains a beloved, capable advanced mirrorless for its era.
Criterion | Olympus E-M1X | Panasonic GH2 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | 9.5/10 | 7/10 |
Autofocus & Speed | 9.7/10 | 6/10 |
Video Performance | 9.0/10 | 6/10 |
Build & Ergonomics | 9.8/10 | 7/10 |
Features & Connectivity | 9.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
Value for Money | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Who Should Choose Which Camera?
-
Choose the Olympus E-M1X if:
- You want a professional-grade camera that excels in stills and video.
- Fast autofocus and burst speed are essential for wildlife or sports.
- You need rugged weather sealing for outdoor shooting.
- You prioritize image stabilization for handheld or macro work.
- Advanced video specs and monitoring are important to you.
-
Choose the Panasonic GH2 if:
- You want a lightweight, affordable entry into MFT photography.
- You primarily shoot street, travel, or casual portraits.
- You favor portability over professional robustness.
- Full HD video is sufficient for your needs.
- You’re on a tighter budget and enjoy tinkering with legacy gear.
Final Thoughts: Bridging Generations with Micro Four Thirds Evolution
While the Panasonic GH2 can still serve dedicated enthusiasts looking for a compact lightweight MFT system with dependable image quality, it shows the limits of early 2010s technology.
The Olympus E-M1X embodies how far the Micro Four Thirds system has evolved - marrying pro-level specs, outstanding image quality, blazing AF, and a complete set of features tailored for working creatives.
If your budget and shooting style allow, the E-M1X offers a transformative upgrade that unlocks new creative possibilities. But if you’re starting out or value portability and price, the GH2 remains a solid gateway into the MFT universe.
For any serious creative, I recommend visiting a local camera store to handle both bodies and see which feels right in your hand. Pair that with your intended lenses and workflow to make a fully informed decision tailored to your artistic goals.
Explore Further
- Check out Olympus’s Pro lens lineup to maximize your E-M1X experience.
- Experiment with the GH2’s advanced AVCHD video modes for cinematic full HD footage.
- Consider adding external microphones or flashes that complement your choice.
- Don’t forget to test drive firmware updates and third-party accessories enhancing functionality.
Your photography journey deserves gear that grows with your vision. Whichever camera you choose, get out there and capture compelling stories.
Happy shooting!
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GH2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-01-24 | 2011-03-23 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 160 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 15.60 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (24, 30, 60fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997 gr (2.20 lb) | 442 gr (0.97 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 124 x 90 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 60 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 655 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery style | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | One |
Retail cost | $2,999 | $1,000 |