Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GX85
Portability
54 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
54 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
Portability
83 Imaging
53 Features
76 Overall
62
83 Imaging
53 Features
76 Overall
62
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GX85 Key Specs
Olympus E-M1X
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Released January 2019
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Panasonic GX85
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 122 x 71 x 44mm
- Introduced April 2016
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GX85 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GX85, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and GX85 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1X was revealed 2 years after the GX85 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic GX85 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1X matches up versus the GX85 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GX85 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Panasonic GX85 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic GX85
| E-M1X | GX85 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2019 |  | April 2016 | More modern by 35 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX85 over the Olympus E-M1X
| GX85 | E-M1X | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 1037k | Clearer screen (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic GX85
| E-M1X | GX85 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GX85 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1X features exterior dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Panasonic GX85 has proportions of 122mm x 71mm x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GX85 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1X versus the GX85.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1X and GX85 is 54 and 83 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GX85 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by researching specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and GX85.
To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus E-M1X to provide you with more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1X will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GX85 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M1X Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic GX85 Portrait photography highlights
has manual focus
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
supports RAW files
focusing manually
decent MP (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M1X as a Street photography camera
Panasonic GX85 as a Street photography camera
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
boasts touch to focus
weather proof
great ISO range (25,600)
heavier than others (997 grams)
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
has touch to focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus E-M1X
Sports photography with Panasonic GX85
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
weather proof
great battery pack (870 per charge)
sensor has phase detect AF
silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
bad battery power (290 shots)
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M1X as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic GX85 as a Travel photography camera
great battery pack (870 per charge)
weather proof
supports bluetooth
boasts touch to focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
heavier than others (997 grams)
has touch to focus
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
bad battery power (290 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M1X Landscape photography advice
Panasonic GX85 Landscape photography advice
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather proof
great battery pack (870 CIPA)
2 card slots
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
bad battery power (290 CIPA)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X Vlogging information
Panasonic GX85 Vlogging information
selfie friendly display
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focusing
high res video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes mic support
heavier than others (997g)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect focusing
great video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic port
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GX85 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 |
| Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2019-01-24 | 2016-04-05 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4592 x 3448 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,764 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/16000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 997 gr (2.20 lbs) | 426 gr (0.94 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 122 x 71 x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 71 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 662 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 870 shots | 290 shots |
| Battery form | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Two | Single |
| Launch price | $2,999 | $800 |