Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS35
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73


89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Announced January 2014
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS30
- New Model is Panasonic ZS40

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic ZS35, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.

The E-M1X was brought out 5 years after the ZS35 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M1X scores against the ZS35 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic ZS35
E-M1X | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2019 | ![]() | January 2014 | Newer by 62 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-M1X
ZS35 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic ZS35
E-M1X | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1X has got physical dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has specifications of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic ZS35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1X versus the ZS35.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and ZS35 is 54 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The pic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and ZS35.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1X because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1X will result in greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X provides an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2019-01-24 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997g (2.20 lb) | 305g (0.67 lb) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Built-in | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Launch price | $2,999 | $300 |