Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax MX-1
Portability
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
Portability
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
Olympus E-M1X
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
Pentax MX-1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Introduced July 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-M1X versus Pentax MX-1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and MX-1 (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and MX-1 (1/1.7") offer different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1X was brought out 5 years after the MX-1 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax MX-1 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M1X grades versus the MX-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Pentax MX-1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Pentax MX-1
| E-M1X | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2019 |  | July 2013 | More modern by 68 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 920k | Sharper display (+117k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus E-M1X
| MX-1 | E-M1X |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Pentax MX-1
| E-M1X | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1X has outer measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) and the Pentax MX-1 has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") along with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1X versus Pentax MX-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1X versus the MX-1.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1X and MX-1 is 54 and 84 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by going over specifications. The pic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1X and MX-1.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1X featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will offer extra detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M1X should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M1X as a Portrait photography camera
Pentax MX-1 as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
decent MP (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
delivers RAW files
focusing manually
provides face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M1X Street photography details
Pentax MX-1 Street photography details
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
comes with touch focus
environment proofing
great high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than competition (997 grams)
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
sensor is small (1/1.7")
more heavy than competition (391g)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Olympus E-M1X Sports photography information
Pentax MX-1 Sports photography information
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
high fps (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
great battery life (870 shots)
comes with phase detect auto focus
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
good battery life (290 CIPA)
low frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M1X Travel photography info
Pentax MX-1 Travel photography info
great battery life (870 shots)
environment proofing
connects via bluetooth
comes with touch focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
more heavy than competition (997g)
good battery life (290 per charge)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (391g)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1X
Landscape photography with Pentax MX-1
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
environment proofing
great battery life (870 CIPA)
2 card slots
focusing manually
decently wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (290 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
doesn't have Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X Vlogging details
Pentax MX-1 Vlogging details
selfie friendly display
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have microphone support
more heavy than competition (997 grams)
decently wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than competition (391 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-M1X vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Pentax MX-1 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2019-01-24 | 2013-07-01 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 997 gr (2.20 lb) | 391 gr (0.86 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 208 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 870 photographs | 290 photographs |
| Battery style | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-Li-106 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Two | One |
| Retail pricing | $2,999 | $400 |