Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh CX1
54 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
93 Imaging
31 Features
30 Overall
30
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh CX1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and CX1 (9MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1X was introduced 10 years later than the CX1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M1X scores vs the CX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Ricoh CX1
| E-M1X | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2019 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 121 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-M1X
| CX1 | E-M1X |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Ricoh CX1
| E-M1X | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1X offers external dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh CX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1X against the CX1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1X and CX1 is 54 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1X and CX1.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1X having a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1X will offer you greater detail using its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger E-M1X will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Ricoh CX1 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2019-01-24 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 997g (2.20 lbs) | 180g (0.40 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 870 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Built-in | - |
| Battery model | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Two | 1 |
| Launch cost | $2,999 | $299 |