Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5b1/2c5b1898c62d7f187c0d40fb1eefb6649a2b2e72" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1X front Olympus OM-D E-M1X front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d771b/d771b66d884c4e557825e4da5dca0dcce000b804" alt="Samsung HZ10W front Samsung HZ10W front"
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Launched January 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Other Name is WB500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and HZ10W (10MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and HZ10W (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M1X was released 9 years after the HZ10W which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-M1X scores against the HZ10W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Samsung HZ10W. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Samsung HZ10W
E-M1X | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2019 | ![]() | May 2009 | Newer by 119 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus E-M1X
HZ10W | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Samsung HZ10W
E-M1X | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1X enjoys exterior dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ10W has proportions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1X vs the HZ10W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcabf/dcabf79e9c6c7faf0676a5dab31c4bc7e4243bf3" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1X and HZ10W is 54 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa148/aa1484978bed511ababb40b20fdbdf462236b7d1" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1X and HZ10W.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1X because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1X will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M1X should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60c2c/60c2c7e1392a5aae01a8ff3b68e5a3b88d23e4b1" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a9ad/8a9ad83ee6c30931e61e003cfcf2f798f931b28d" alt="Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Samsung HZ10W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Samsung HZ10W |
Alternate name | - | WB500 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2019-01-24 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2432 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997 grams (2.20 pounds) | 249 grams (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 images | - |
Battery form | Built-in | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Launch pricing | $2,999 | $300 |