Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ15W
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
90 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Launched February 2009
- Other Name is WB550
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus E-M1X versus Samsung HZ15W, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and HZ15W (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and HZ15W (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1X was released 10 years later than the HZ15W and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ15W being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-M1X scores versus the HZ15W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Samsung HZ15W. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Samsung HZ15W
E-M1X | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2019 | February 2009 | More recent by 121 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus E-M1X
HZ15W | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Samsung HZ15W
E-M1X | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement |
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1X offers outside dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ15W has proportions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1X versus Samsung HZ15W in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1X vs the HZ15W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and HZ15W is 54 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching technical specs. The graphic here should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and HZ15W.
As you can tell, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1X due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1X will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The newer E-M1X is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Samsung HZ15W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Samsung HZ15W |
Also called | - | WB550 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2019-01-24 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997g (2.20 lb) | 249g (0.55 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Built-in | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Pricing at launch | $2,999 | $330 |