Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ25W
54 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Announced July 2010
- Also Known as WB5000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ25W, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and HZ25W (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and HZ25W (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1X was revealed 8 years later than the HZ25W and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-M1X grades against the HZ25W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Samsung HZ25W. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Samsung HZ25W
| E-M1X | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2019 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 105 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus E-M1X
| HZ25W | E-M1X |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Samsung HZ25W
| E-M1X | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1X offers outside dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has sizing of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ25W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1X and the HZ25W.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and HZ25W is 54 and 70 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing specs. The photograph below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and HZ25W.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1X with its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will offer you more detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M1X will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also called as | - | WB5000 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2019-01-24 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 997 gr (2.20 lb) | 428 gr (0.94 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 870 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Built-in | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 2 | Single |
| Cost at launch | $2,999 | $350 |