Clicky

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
54
Imaging
61
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1X front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Olympus E-M1X
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
  • Announced January 2019
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Also Known as WB650
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-M1X and Samsung HZ35W, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M1X was brought out 8 years later than the HZ35W and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M1X matches up versus the HZ35W for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Samsung HZ35W

 E-M1X HZ35W 
ReleasedJanuary 2019June 2010More recent by 105 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k614kSharper display (+423k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-M1X

 HZ35W E-M1X 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Samsung HZ35W

 E-M1X HZ35W 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Display size3"3"Same display measurements

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1X features outside measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1X and Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1X vs the HZ35W.

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1X and HZ35W is 54 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1X and HZ35W.

To sum up, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1X because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1X will give greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1X
Portrait photography with Samsung HZ35W
76
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
34
focusing manually
offers face detection focus
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Street photography information
Samsung HZ35W Street photography information
67
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
provides focus via touch
weather sealing
very good ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than competition (997 grams)
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (245g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Sports photography info
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography info
80
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
max fps high (60.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
weather sealing
great battery life (870 CIPA)
comes with phase detect AF
42
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Travel photography features
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography features
68
great battery life (870 shots)
weather sealing
has bluetooth
provides focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
more heavy than competition (997 grams)
63
lighter than competition (245 grams)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (360mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Landscape photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography highlights
79
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
great battery life (870 per charge)
has double storage slots
43
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1X
Vlogging with Samsung HZ35W
68
display is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focusing
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external microphone port
more heavy than competition (997g)
31
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
lighter than competition (245g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1X and Samsung HZ35W
 Olympus OM-D E-M1XSamsung HZ35W
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1X Samsung HZ35W
Also Known as - WB650
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2019-01-24 2010-06-16
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Dual TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,037k dot 614k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 16 secs
Max shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 5.00 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 997 gr (2.20 lbs) 245 gr (0.54 lbs)
Physical dimensions 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 870 pictures -
Battery format Built-in -
Battery ID - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Two One
Launch cost $2,999 $300