Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73


91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Also Known as WB650

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-M1X and Samsung HZ35W, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

The E-M1X was brought out 8 years later than the HZ35W and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M1X matches up versus the HZ35W for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Samsung HZ35W
E-M1X | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2019 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 105 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 614k | Sharper display (+423k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-M1X
HZ35W | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Samsung HZ35W
E-M1X | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1X features outside measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1X and Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1X vs the HZ35W.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1X and HZ35W is 54 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1X and HZ35W.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1X because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1X will give greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1X vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Samsung HZ35W |
Also Known as | - | WB650 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2019-01-24 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 997 gr (2.20 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 pictures | - |
Battery format | Built-in | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Launch cost | $2,999 | $300 |