Olympus E-M1X vs Sony A99 II
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
57 Imaging
77 Features
92 Overall
83
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Launched January 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Announced September 2016
- Superseded the Sony A99
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony A99 II Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M1X vs Sony A99 II, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and A99 II (Full frame) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1X was manufactured 2 years after the A99 II which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M1X scores against the A99 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony A99 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Sony Alpha A99 II. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Sony A99 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Sony A99 II
E-M1X | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2019 | September 2016 | More modern by 29 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Olympus E-M1X
A99 II | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1229k | 1037k | Sharper screen (+192k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Sony A99 II
E-M1X | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1X enjoys external dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) and the Sony A99 II has sizing of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") with a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1X vs Sony A99 II in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1X against the A99 II.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1X and A99 II is 54 and 57 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and A99 II.
Clearly, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1X because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony A99 II will deliver greater detail due to its extra 22MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M1X will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2019-01-24 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 7952 x 5304 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 399 |
Cross focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997g (2.20 lb) | 849g (1.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 92 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 shots | 490 shots |
Battery style | Built-in | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Launch pricing | $2,999 | $3,198 |