Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H200
Portability
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
Portability
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H200 Key Specs
Olympus E-M1X
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
Sony H200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H200 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-M1X versus Sony H200, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1X (20MP) and the H200 (20MP) is fairly similar but the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and H200 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1X was announced 6 years later than the H200 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M1X matches up versus the H200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Sony H200
| E-M1X | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2019 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 74 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus E-M1X
| H200 | E-M1X |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Sony H200
| E-M1X | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1X features external dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has sizing of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1X versus Sony H200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1X compared to the H200.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and H200 is 54 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The visual below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1X and H200.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses the exact same resolution but different sensor measurements. The E-M1X has got the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult. The fresher E-M1X should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1X
Portrait photography with Sony H200
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detection focus
exports RAW files
MP count decent (20MP)
offers face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M1X Street photography highlights
Sony H200 Street photography highlights
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
includes touch to focus
environment proof
above average high ISO (25,600)
heavier than competition in class (997g)
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competitors in class (530g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus E-M1X
Sports photography with Sony H200
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
max fps high (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
environment proof
great battery power (870 shots)
has phase detect auto focus
great zoom range (24-633mm 26.4 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
offers tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (240 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M1X as a Travel photography camera
Sony H200 as a Travel photography camera
great battery power (870 shots)
environment proof
connects via bluetooth
includes touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
heavier than competition in class (997 grams)
MP count decent (20MP)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (633mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
not so great battery power (240 per charge)
more heavy than competitors in class (530 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1X
Landscape photography with Sony H200
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment proof
great battery power (870 per charge)
two card slots
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
not so great battery power (240 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X Vlogging info
Sony H200 Vlogging info
screen is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focus
high res video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
has external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (997 grams)
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone support
more heavy than competitors in class (530g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2019-01-24 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 20cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 997 grams (2.20 pounds) | 530 grams (1.17 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 870 shots | 240 shots |
| Battery style | Built-in | AA |
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 2 | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $2,999 | $250 |