Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H300
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Launched January 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Announced February 2014
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H300 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H300, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1X (20MP) and the H300 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and H300 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1X was released 5 years later than the H300 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M1X grades versus the H300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Sony H300
E-M1X | H300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2019 | February 2014 | More recent by 61 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Olympus E-M1X
H300 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Sony H300
E-M1X | H300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size |
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1X has got external measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Sony H300 has proportions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1X compared to the H300.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1X and H300 is 54 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1X and H300.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same resolution albeit different sensor measurements. The E-M1X comes with the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier. The more recent E-M1X provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony H300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2019-01-24 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5152 x 3864 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3-5.9 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 201k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.80 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997 grams (2.20 lbs) | 590 grams (1.30 lbs) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery type | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Pricing at release | $2,999 | $249 |